第27章 BOOK III(7)

Ath.A God,who watched over Sparta,seeing into the future,gave you two families of kings instead of one;and thus brought you more within the limits of moderation.In the next place,some human wisdom mingled with divine power,observing that the constitution of your government was still feverish and excited,tempered your inborn strength and pride of birth with the moderation which comes of age,making the power of your twenty-eight elders equal with that of the kings in the most important matters.But your third saviour,perceiving that your government was still swelling and foaming,and desirous to impose a curb upon it,instituted the Ephors,whose power he made to resemble that of magistrates elected by lot;and by this arrangement the kingly office,being compounded of the right elements and duly moderated,was preserved,and was the means of preserving all the rest.Since,if there had been only the original legislators,Temenus,Cresphontes,and their contemporaries,as far as they were concerned not even the portion of Aristodemus would have been preserved;for they had no proper experience in legislation,or they would surely not have imagined that oaths would moderate a youthful spirit invested with a power which might be converted into a tyranny.Now that God has instructed us what sort of government would have been or will be lasting,there is no wisdom,as I have already said,in judging after the event;there is no difficulty in learning from an example which has already occurred.But if any one could have foreseen all this at the time,and had been able to moderate the government of the three kingdoms and unite them into one,he might have saved all the excellent institutions which were then conceived;and no Persian or any other armament would have dared to attack us,or would have regarded Hellas as a power to be despised.

Cle.True.

Ath.There was small credit to us,Cleinias,in defeating them;and the discredit was,not that the conquerors did not win glorious victories both by land and sea,but what,in my opinion,brought discredit was,first of all,the circumstance that of the three cities one only fought on behalf of Hellas,and the two others were so utterly good for nothing that the one was waging a mighty war against Lacedaemon,and was thus preventing her from rendering assistance,while the city of Argos,which had the precedence at the time of the distribution,when asked to aid in repelling the barbarian,would not answer to the call,or give aid.Many things might be told about Hellas in connection with that war which are far from honourable;nor,indeed,can we rightly say that Hellas repelled the invader;for the truth is,that unless the Athenians and Lacedaemonians,acting in concert,had warded off the impending yoke,all the tribes of Hellas would have been fused in a chaos of Hellenes mingling with one another,of barbarians mingling with Hellenes,and Hellenes with barbarians;just as nations who are now subject to the Persian power,owing to unnatural separations and combinations of them,are dispersed and scattered,and live miserably.

These,Cleinias and Megillus,are the reproaches which we have to make against statesmen and legislators,as they are called,past and present,if we would analyse the causes of their failure,and find out what else might have been done.We said,for instance,just now,that there ought to be no great and unmixed powers;and this was under the idea that a state ought to be free and wise and harmonious,and that a legislator ought to legislate with a view to this end.Nor is there any reason to be surprised at our continually proposing aims for the legislator which appear not to be always the same;but we should consider when we say that temperance is to be the aim,or wisdom is to be the aim,or friendship is to be the aim,that all these aims are really the same;and if so,a variety in the modes of expression ought not to disturb us.

Cle.Let us resume the argument in that spirit.And now,speaking of friendship and wisdom and freedom,I wish that you would tell me at what,in your opinion,the legislator should aim.

Ath.Hear me,then:there are two mother forms of states from which the rest may be truly said to be derived;and one of them may be called monarchy and the other democracy:the Persians have the highest form of the one,and we of the other;almost all the rest,as I was saying,are variations of these.Now,if you are to have liberty and the combination of friendship with wisdom,you must have both these forms of government in a measure;the argument emphatically declares that no city can be well governed which is not made up of both.

Cle.Impossible.

Ath.Neither the one,if it be exclusively and excessively attached to monarchy,nor the other,if it be similarly attached to freedom,observes moderation;but your states,the Laconian and Cretan,have more of it;and the same was the case with the Athenians and Persians of old time,but now they have less.Shall Itell you why?

Cle.By all means,if it will tend to elucidate our subject.

Ath.Hear,then:-There was a time when the Persians had more of the state which is a mean between slavery and freedom.In the reign of Cyrus they were freemen and also lords of many others:the rulers gave a share of freedom to the subjects,and being treated as equals,the soldiers were on better terms with their generals,and showed themselves more ready in the hour of danger.And if there was any wise man among them,who was able to give good counsel,he imparted his wisdom to the public;for the king was not jealous,but allowed him full liberty of speech,and gave honour to those who could advise him in any matter.And the nation waxed in all respects,because there was freedom and friendship and communion of mind among them.

Cle.That certainly appears to have been the case.

Ath.How,then,was this advantage lost under Cambyses,and again recovered under Darius?Shall I try to divine?